Burns
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 453-463, August 2004

High frequency oscillatory ventilation in burn patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome

  • Robert Cartotto

      Affiliations

    • Room D710, Ross Tilley Burn Center, Sunnybrook and Womens’ College Health Sciences Center, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ont., Canada M4N 3M5
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-416-480-6706; fax: +1-416-480-6708.
  • ,
  • Sandi Ellis

      Affiliations

    • Room D710, Ross Tilley Burn Center, Sunnybrook and Womens’ College Health Sciences Center, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ont., Canada M4N 3M5
  • ,
  • Manuel Gomez

      Affiliations

    • Room D710, Ross Tilley Burn Center, Sunnybrook and Womens’ College Health Sciences Center, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ont., Canada M4N 3M5
  • ,
  • Andrew Cooper

      Affiliations

    • Department of Critical Care Medicine and Anesthesiology, Sunnybrook and Womens’ College Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ont., Canada M4N 3M5
  • ,
  • Terry Smith

      Affiliations

    • Department of Critical Care Medicine and Anesthesiology, Sunnybrook and Womens’ College Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ont., Canada M4N 3M5

Accepted 21 January 2004.

Abstract 

Background: High frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) improves gas exchange while providing lung protective effects during the ventilation of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study was to review our experience with HFOV in adult burn patients with oxygenation failure secondary to ARDS. Methods: Retrospective cohort review of all burn patients treated with HFOV at a regional adult burn center. Results: All values are reported as the (S.D.). HFOV was used on 28 occasions in 25 patients (age 44±16 years, %TBSA burns 40±15, and a 28% incidence of inhalation injury) who had severe oxygenation failure from ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 ratio 98±26, and oxygenation index (OI) (FiO2×100×mean airway pressure/PaO2) 27±10) following 4.8±4.4 days of conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). After switching from CMV to HFOV, there were significant improvements in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio within 1h and in the oxygenation index within 24h. The duration of HFOV was 6.1±5.8 days. HFOV was continued during 26 surgeries for 14 patients where a mean of 18±9% TBSA burns were excised and closed. The only complications related to HFOV were three episodes of severe hypercapnia. In-hospital mortality was 32%. Conclusions: HFOV was safe, and was highly effective in correcting oxygenation failure associated with ARDS in burn patients, and can be successfully used as an intra-operative ventilation modality for burn patients.

Keywords:  Ventilation, ARDS, Lung injury, Burns

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0305-4179(04)00034-8

doi:10.1016/j.burns.2004.01.015

Burns
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 453-463, August 2004