Burns
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 431-437 , August 2004

Evaluation of a porcine origin acellular dermal matrix and small intestinal submucosa as dermal replacements in preventing secondary skin graft contraction

  • T.M MacLeod

      Affiliations

    • Restoration of Appearance and Function Trust, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44-1923-835-815; fax: +44-1923-844-031.
    • ,
  • P Sarathchandra

      Affiliations

    • Northwick Park Institute for Medical Research, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK
    • Tel.: +44-208-969-3265; fax: +44-208-869-3270.
    • ,
  • G Williams

      Affiliations

    • Northwick Park Institute for Medical Research, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK
    • Tel.: +44-208-969-3265; fax: +44-208-869-3270.
    • ,
  • R Sanders

      Affiliations

    • Restoration of Appearance and Function Trust, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK
    • ,
  • C.J Green

      Affiliations

    • Northwick Park Institute for Medical Research, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK
    • Tel.: +44-208-969-3265; fax: +44-208-869-3270.

,Accepted 14 January 2004.

References 

  1. Cuono C, Langdon R, McGuire J. Use of cultured epidermal autografts and dermal allografts as skin replacement after burn injury. Lancet. 1986;1:1123–1124
  2. Nave M. Wound bed preparation: approaches to replacement of dermis. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 1992;13:147–153
  3. Burke JF, Yannas IV, Quinby WCJ, Bondoc CC, Jung WK. Successful use of a physiologically acceptable artificial skin in the treatment of extensive burn injury. Ann. Surg. 1981;194:413–428
  4. Heimbach D, Luterman A, Burke J, Cram A, Herndon D, Hunt J, et al.  Artificial dermis for major burns. A multi-center randomized clinical trial. Ann. Surg. 1988;208:313–320
  5. Hansbrough JF, Dore C, Hansbrough WB. Clinical trials of a living dermal tissue replacement placed beneath meshed, split-thickness skin grafts on excised burn wounds. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 1992;13:519–529
  6. Matsuda K, Suzuki S, Isshiki N, Yoshioka K, Okada T, Ikada Y. Influence of glycosaminoglycans on the collagen sponge component of a bilayer artificial skin. Biomaterials. 1990;11:351–355
  7. Matsuda K, Suzuki S, Isshiki N, Yoshioka K, Okada T, Hyon SH, et al.  A bilayer artificial skin capable of sustained release of an antibiotic. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1991;44:142–146
  8. Koide M, Osaki K, Konishi J, Oyamada K, Katakura T, Takahashi A, et al.  A new type of biomaterial for artificial skin: dehydrothermally cross- linked composites of fibrillar and denatured collagens. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1993;27:79–87
  9. Bell E, Sher S, Hull B, Merrill C, Rosen S, Chamson A, et al.  The reconstitution of living skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1983;1983(81):2s–10s
  10. Hansbrough JF, Boyce ST, Cooper ML, Foreman TJ. Burn wound closure with cultured autologous keratinocytes and fibroblasts attached to a collagen–glycosaminoglycan substrate. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1989;262:2125–2130
  11. Kuroyanagi Y. A cultured skin substitute composed of fibroblasts and keratinocytes with a collagen matrix: preliminary results of clinical trials. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1993;31:340–349
  12. De Vries HJC, Middelkoop E, Mekkes JR, Dutrieux RP. Dermal regeneration in native non-cross-linked collagen sponges with different matrix molecules. Wound Repair Regen. 1994;2:37–47
  13. Grillo HC, McKhann CF. The acceptance and evolution of dermal homografts freed of viable cells. Transplantation. 1964;2:48–59
  14. Oliver RF, Grant RA, Kent CM. The fate of cutaneously and subcutaneously implanted trypsin purified dermal collagen in the pig. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1972;53:540–549
  15. Grinnell F, Toda K, Lamke-Seymour C. Reconstruction of human epidermis in vitro is accompanied by transient activation of basal keratinocyte spreading. Exp. Cell Res. 1987;172:439–449
  16. Fang CH, Robb EC, Yu GS, Alexander JW, Warden GD. Observations on stability and contraction of composite skin grafts: xenodermis or allodermis with an isograft overlay. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 1990;11:538–542
  17. Sasamoto Y, Alexander JW, Babcock GF. Prolonged survival of reconstituted skin grafts without immunosuppression. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 1990;11:190–200
  18. Srivastava A. Xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix as a dermal substitute in rats. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 1999;20:382–390
  19. Wang HJ, Chen TM, Cheng TY. Use of a porcine dermis template to enhance widely expanded mesh autologous split-thickness skin graft growth: preliminary report. J. Trauma. 1997;42:177–182
  20. Lindberg K, Prevel C, Badylak SF. The effect of configuration of the SIS dermal device upon split-thickness skin graft take and wound contracture. In: Proceedings of Second SIS Symposium, Orlando, FL; 1998. p. 57–8.
  21. Prevel C, Lindberg K, Badylak S. Extracellular matrix as a dermal replacement to support autologous split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) in porcine full-thickness skin wounds. In: Proceedings of Second SIS Symposium, Orlando, FL; 1998. p. 59–60.
  22. Oliver RF, Grant RA. Reconstruction of full-thickness loss skin wounds using skin collagen allografts. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1979;32:87–90

PII: S0305-4179(04)00037-3

doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.01.018

Burns
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 431-437 , August 2004

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution