« Previous
Next »
Burns
Volume 31, Issue 5
, Pages 562-567
, August 2005
A silver coated dressing reduces the incidence of early burn wound cellulitis and associated costs of inpatient treatment: Comparative patient care audits
References
- . Surveillance of burn wound infection: a proposal for definitions. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1998;19:386–389
- . T lymphocytes, immunosuppression in the burned patient: a review. Burns. 1994;20(6):470–487
- . How do I diagnose and treat wound infection. Br J Nurs. 1998;7(6):335–338
- . Wounds that won’t heal. Nurs Times. 1985;81(46):16–19
- . Treatment of infection in burns. In: Herndon DN editors. Total burn care. 2nd ed.. London: Saunders; 2002;p. 136
- . Silver 1: its antibacterial properties and mechanism of action. J Wound Care. 2002;11(4):125–130
- . Pseudomonas aeruginosa septicaemia in burns. Burns. 1999;25:611–616
- . Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus versus the burned patient. Burns. 1998;24:91–98
- . Multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak in a burns unit-an infection control study. Burns. 2001;27(2):131–135
- . A matched-pair, randomised study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Acticoat* silver-coated dressing for the treatment of burn wounds. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1998;19(6):531–537
- . Once-daily wound cleansing and dressing change: efficacy and cost. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1997;18:139–140
- . The cost of cost-savings. Prim Intention. 2003;11(1):19–22
- . Part 1: effects of silver on wound management. Wounds. Compendium Clin Res Pract. Suppl. A. 2001;13(1):4–15
- . Wound management in an era of increasing bacterial antibiotic resistance: a role for topical silver treatment. Am J Infect Control. 1998;26:572–577
- . A comparison of the antimicrobial effects of four silver-containing dressings on three organisms. J Wound Care. 2003;12(3):101–107
- . An in vitro analysis of the antimicrobial properties of 10 silver-containing dressings. J Wound Care. 2003;12(8):305–309
- . Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial action of Acticoat* antimicrobial barrier dressing. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1999;20(3):195–199
- . An in vitro study of the anti-microbial efficacy of a 1% silver sulphadiazine and 0.2% chlorhexidine. Burns. 2004;30(1):35–41
- . The use of silver coated dressings on donor site wounds: a prospective, controlled matched pair study. Burns. 2001;27:621–627
- . CDC definitions of nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control. 1988;16:128–140
- . A cost-benefit analysis of initial burn cultures in the management of acute burns. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2000;21(4):300–304
- . Silver 2: toxicity in mammals and how its products aid wound repair. J Wound Care. 2002;11(5):73–177
- . A comparative analysis of the anti-microbial efficacy of a novel silver coated dressing, a silver sulfadiazine and silver nitrate. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1997;18:178
- . Leukopenia in non-septic patients receiving 1% silver sulphadiazine cream treatment: a survey. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1989;9:606–609
- . In vitro cytotoxicity of silver: implication for clinical wound care. Burns. 2004;30(2):140–147
- . How safe is silver in wound care?. J Wound Care. 2004;13:131–135
PII: S0305-4179(05)00023-9
doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.12.009
© 2005 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Burns
Volume 31, Issue 5
, Pages 562-567
, August 2005
