| | Correction of thumb deformities after burn: Versatility of first dorsal metacarpal artery flapAccepted 25 April 2006. Abstract In the management of a debilitated burned hand due to contractures, thumb reconstruction constitutes the most crucial part for a beneficial functional outcome. Among the limited local flap alternatives for the thumb, the first dorsal metacarpal artery flap, harvested from the dorsal aspect of the index finger can provide elastic, durable and sensate coverage for soft tissue defects after contracture release. In a 3-year period, neurovascular island first dorsal metacarpal artery flap was used in 14 patients suffering thumb deformities. The time elapsed after the underlying injury until reconstruction ranged from 5 months to 17 years. Follow-up revealed that all deformities were successfully treated with satisfactory functional recovery and cosmetic results. Donor site morbidity was minimal with an acceptable scar on the dorsum of the index finger and adequate tendon gliding without producing extension deficit. Our experience with management of deformities involving the thumb and/or adjacent thenar area revealed that the first dorsal metacarpal artery flap is a reliable local neurovascular island flap option, offering acceptable functional and cosmetic outcomes in respect to sensation, elasticity, durability and skin-match. 1. Introduction  Patients suffering from major burns frequently have hand involvement; it was reported that over 85% of burn victims have hand burns [1]. Sometimes because of ignorance of the hands during the management of a major burn or sometimes because of inappropriate treatment and rehabilitation, deep burns to hand may result in a great spectrum of hand deformities that impairs overall hand function depending on the part of the hand that was involved [2], [3]. The goal of reconstruction should be maximum restoration of hand function. Being the only opposing digit against the others, when the thumb is involved, functional loss may be more severe than anticipated. Eventually, because of its major contribution to overall hand function, correction of deformities involving the thumb is crucial. Adequate length, mobility, stability and sensation are the goals of a functional thumb reconstruction [4]. Mild to moderate contractures involving the thumb and adjacent thenar area can be corrected simply by release combined with the basic reconstructive techniques including skin grafting, variations of Z-plasty flaps and Y-V advancement techniques or combination while the severe contractures that cause a major deformity require more complex procedures such as local or regional flaps and even microsurgical transfer of partial toe elements [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. The skin overlying the dorsal aspect of the proximal phalanx of the index finger can be raised either as an island flap based on the first dorsal metacarpal artery (FDMA) or as a neurovascular island flap with inclusion of terminal dorsal sensory branches of radial nerve and can be transferred to reach and cover the defects of the both volar and dorsal aspects of the thumb and first web-space [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. After its anatomical details were first described in 1979, the FDMA flap has become popular among the surgeons dealing with thumb and first web-space reconstruction, owing to its certain advantages including sensory flap cover at one stage and reliable constant anatomy with the ease of dissection [13], [15], [16], [17], [18]. Anatomically, this flap is an axial pattern skin flap extending proximally from the level of metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint and distally to the level of proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint and provides well-vascularized and sensory soft tissue with similar characteristics for replacement of the full-thickness defects involving the thumb and first web-space [15], [16], [17], [18]. In this article, our experiences with the use of FDMA flap for correction of the burn deformities involving the thumb and adjacent thenar area were presented along with the anatomical pitfalls of the flap harvest. Additionally, versatility of this flap in reconstruction of the burned hand was discussed. 2. Operative technique  2.1. Relevant vascular anatomy The radial artery on the dorsum of the hand sends a branch to the dorsal carpal arch and then gives off the first dorsal metacarpal artery before running deep into the palm between the two heads of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. The FDMA is a direct branch of the radial artery while the second, third and forth branch from dorsal carpal arch that lies across the distal carpal row deep to the extensor tendons. The FDMA courses distally and supplies the dorsum of the thumb and radial side of the index finger as dorsal digital arteries beyond the MP joint. The dorsal digital vessels supply the skin of the dorsum of the fingers up to the level of PIP joint. Beyond that joint dorsal branches of the palmar digital arteries supply the dorsal skin. 2.2. Flap design and harvest The skin island of the flap lies over the proximal phalanx of the index finger. The MP and PIP joint represent the distal and proximal extent of the skin island. The flap territory extends between midlateral lines on each side of the proximal phalanx of the index finger. After the outlines of the skin island are marked, a line is drawn along radial border of second metacarpal in a zig-zag or lazy-S fashion, beginning from the proximal base of the skin island and extending proximally up to the tip of the first web space (Fig. 1). Between the bases of the first and second metacarpal bone, the tip of the triangular first web-space can be palpated, indicating the most proximal point of the pedicle dissection. When marked, this point represents the pivot point of the flap. In order to predict where the flap can reach, maximum rotation arch of the flap design can be estimated by measuring the distance of PIP joint from this pivot point. This flap can either be elevated in a distal to proximal fashion without prior pedicle dissection or the skin island elevation may be completed after preceding proximal pedicle identification. The skin island should be elevated just above the extensor hood on the proximal phalanx of the index finger, leaving the well-defined paratenon intact. Pedicle dissection, preferably undertaken under (2×–4×) lope magnification, should start with elevation and establishment of thin skin flaps on both sides of the zig-zag/lazy-S incision. Among the visible superficial dorsal veins, the ones that have about the same course with the pedicle should be preserved and incorporated to the pedicle with a cuff of superficial subcutaneous layer. Inclusion of at least one or more superficial dorsal vein in the pedicle will increase venous outflow and help avoid post-operative flap congestion. A terminal branch of dorsal sensory branches of the radial nerve can be found easily and included in the pedicle. Then, dissection continues deep with incision of the fascia on the radial half of the first dorsal interosseous muscle along the pedicle axis. Because, after arising from the radial artery at the origin of the first dorsal interosseous muscle, FDMA and associated vena comitantes are located deep in the first dorsal web space and adherent to the ulnar half of the dorsal surface of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. During the radial to ulnar elevation of the deep muscle fascia across the ulnar half of the muscle, FDMA readily comes into vision. The rest of the pedicle elevation is carried out under direct vision of the pedicle with careful cauterization of the branches running deep into muscle either to supply the muscle or to join with the palmar arch. The periosteum at the dorsal radial edge of the second metacarpal bone represents the deep ulnar limit of the pedicle elevation and the dissection in ulnar direction is stopped when it is reached. Inclusion of a muscle cuff around the FDMA will prevent possible unintentional injuries to the delicate pedicle. The harvested island flap can either be transposed onto the defect directly or transferred through a skin tunnel. The donor site is resurfaced with a skin graft (either full thickness or thick split thickness). 3. Report of the cases  During the last 3 years (between 2002 and 2005), neurovascular island FDMA flap was used in 14 patients suffering from thumb deformities after burn (Table 1). Ages of the patients ranged from 2 to 34 with an average of 21 and all were adult males in military service with the exception of a 2-year-old girl. The left thumb was involved in eight patients while six patients suffered from deformities involving the right thumb. In five patients, deformities also involved the adjacent thenar area. The time elapsed from injury until reconstruction ranged from 5 months to 17 years. Eight patients were operated on under axillary block anesthesia whereas the remaining six patients required general anesthesia. | | |  | Patient | Sex and age | Cause | Time (year) | Deformity | Procedures |  |
|---|
 | 1 | M/21 | Scald | 12 | Thenar contracture with MP joint deformity | Contracture release, MP joint atrodesis, reconstruction with FDMA flap |  |  | 2 | M/22 | Contact to fireplace | 16 | IP joint flexion contracture | Contracture release, IP joint corrective atrodesis with bone graft and reconstruction with FDMA flap |  |  | 3 | M/20 | Contact to fireplace | 7 | IP joint flexion contracture and deformity | Contracture release, IP joint corrective atrodesis with bone graft and reconstruction with FDMA flap |  |  | 4 | M/22 | Contact to fireplace | 17 | IP joint contracture of with ulnar deviation | Contracture release, IP joint atrodesis and reconstruction with FDMA flap |  |  | 5 | F/2 | Contact to fireplace | 7 m | Severe thenar contracture with palmar extension | Contracture release and reconstruction of thenar area with FDMA flap and skin graft to palmar area |  |  | 6 | M/20 | Contact to fireplace | 13 | IP joint flexion contracture | Contracture release, IP joint atrodesis and reconstruction with FDMA flap |  |  | 7 | M/21 | Scald | 11 | MP joint flexion contracture | Contracture release and reconstruction with FDMA flap |  |  | 8 | M/23 | Contact to fireplace | 8 | IP joint flexion contracture with severe scar formation on ulnar side | Contracture release, IP joint atrodesis and reconstruction with FDMA flap |  |  | 9 | M/25 | Contact to fireplace | 7 | IP joint flexion contracture | Contracture release and reconstruction with FDMA flap |  |  | 10 | M/34 | Electric | 5 m | MP joint flexion contractures with thenar involvement | Contracture release, IP joint atrodesis and reconstruction with FDMA flap and skin graft to thenar area |  |  | 11 | M/20 | Scald | 13 | Contracture of thenar area | Contracture release and reconstruction with FDMA flap |  |  | 12 | M/21 | Contact to fireplace | 10 | Severe flexion contracture of IP joint with fix ulnar deviation | Contracture release, IP joint atrodesis and reconstruction with FDMA flap |  |  | 13 | M/22 | Scald | 4 | MP joint flexion contractures with thenar involvement | Contracture release and reconstruction with FDMA flap |  |  | 14 | M/21 | Contact to fireplace | 6 | IP joint contracture with ulnar deviation | Contracture release, IP joint atrodesis and reconstruction with FDMA flap |  | | | |
The patients were placed in the supine position with the upper extremity abducted and placed on the hand table and operations were accomplished under tourniquet. After contracture release, if bone or joint deformities existed, corrective arthorodesis was performed first with closing/opening wedge osteotomies followed by K-wire fixation. In two patients, small bone grafts were required to pack the bone gaps. Depending on the location and the size of skin defect on the thumb or first web space, which appeared after contracture release, an FDMA neurovascular island flap was designed over the proximal phalanx of the index finger, then harvested and transferred on to the defects as described above. 4. Results  All flaps survived and the early post-operative periods were uneventful. The flap size ranged from 1.5× 2 cm to 3× 5.5 cm. The patients were followed 7–14 months (mean 9 months). All flaps provided adequate soft tissue cover for the exposed vital structures. In two patients, split-thickness skin grafts were used for replacement of the residual skin defects beyond the bone or joint exposition that was covered by the flap. Associated thenar contracture was reconstructed with release followed by skin grafting in one patient. In 10 patients that required bony correction, adequate bony union was achieved with 5–6 weeks of K-wire stabilization. No donor site complication was encountered with a graft-take of 100%. Post-operatively, all patients were given a physiotherapy regimen for rehabilitation. In the case, in which corrective arthrodesis was performed, physiotherapy was postponed 6–8 weeks until the bony union was confirmed while rehabilitation of the others was instituted earlier following wound healing and graft take, usually at the second week after surgery. The flaps were both elastic and durable enough and have grown well with a favorable tissue match for the thumb. Sensation was almost the same as in the original donor site and the patients were informed about the time-period required for adaptation of the brain to new localization of the flap may take months to years. Donor site morbidity was minimal with an acceptable scar, and tendon gliding under skin graft was sufficient without producing any deficit in the functions of index finger. Late follow-up of the patients revealed that all deformities were successfully treated with satisfactory functional recovery and all patients were satisfied with the results (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). Regarding how common we used FDMA flap; all patients that underwent surgical treatment for post-burn contractures between 2002 and 2005 were reviewed retrospectively, revealing that 39 of the 92 patients had hand involvement with thumb deformities. In 14 of 39 contractures (about 36%), the FDMA flap was used for reconstruction. 5. Discussion  Seldom does one encounter a burned hand deformity resulting from an isolated injury because hand burns usually appear as a component of more extensive body burns [19]. In cases of major burns, focusing on patient's survival as a priority may be suggested to be a justification for ignorance of the prompt and proper care for the hands. Debilitating burned hand deformities eventually ensue and future reconstructive attempts rarely satisfy. Despite this general knowledge, what may be noted in our series is that, the majority of our patients have only isolated hand deformity, being otherwise healthy individuals. In our country, isolated burned hand deformities do not seem to be rare and cannot be justified by life saving concerns of a major burn. Especially, palmar contact with heaters by children often results in small third degree hand burns, which usually manifest as digital contractures after healing. However, it was reported that burn deformities usually could not be prevented, even if everything was done correctly during the acute phase care of the victim [20]. Our hospital is a military hospital and in our country, military service is an obligation for all male citizens when they reach age 20. Because of socioeconomic reasons and with the expectation of treatment for free by the government when they are doing their military service, most of the families from rural area intentionally postponed the treatment of minor burn contractures sustained by their children. All of our patients except one were young males with thumb deformities due to untreated childhood burns to their hands, but were otherwise healthy and thus eligible for military service. Once the hand deformity occurs, it is a difficult problem for the reconstructive surgeon. Grasp and pinch functions of the hand are severely impaired when the thumb is involved. The contribution of thumb to overall hand function is reported to be 40% [21]. Sensation, adequate length, mobility, stability as well as aesthetics are the well-known goals of a functional thumb reconstruction [22], [23]. Hands also have an important role in body image and a cosmetically abnormal hand will be hidden most of the time, especially for socialized individuals [24]. In most digital contractures, treatment was ignored early during childhood or persisted despite the prompt treatment, and lead to development of severe joint deformities in a growing hand. Late reconstruction of these bony deformities usually necessitates arthrodesis for correction. The same is true for the majority of our patients who are young adults with untreated childhood burns to their hands. That's why; corrective arthrodesis of the IP joints was performed to achieve a thumb in functional position. In correction of deformities involving the thumb, the first step should be the release of soft tissue contracture. Minor soft-tissue contractures can be corrected with Z-plasties when there is a localized band with surrounding healthy skin. However, release of more complicated contractures discloses a skin defect usually larger than anticipated and sometimes results in exposure of bone and/or neurovascular bundles. Skin grafts may be used for resurfacing unless bone, joint or important anatomic structures are exposed. Otherwise, local or regional flaps and in some cases free flaps are required [10], [11], [12]. Skin-grafting has well-known disadvantages and cannot be applied where underlying bony correction is performed. Availability of unaffected healthy skin adjacent to the finger may limit the use of local flaps such as transposition, rotation, and advancement flaps. Regional flap alternatives from the uninjured parts of the hand may well be the best treatment option depending on the location of the deformity [10]. Different flaps have been proposed for thumb and first web space reconstructions [11], including FDMA flap [15], [16], [17], [18], radial-inervated cross-finger [25], dorsal metacarpal flaps [26], neurovascular island flap (Littler Flap) [27], dorsoulnar flap [28], the first dorsal metacarpal flap [29], palmar-hinged flap [30]. However there are limitations for their use, such as donor site morbidity and inadequate flap size, requiring two stage procedures. The FDMA flap was the advantage of a wide rotation arch, constant and reliable pedicle, minimal donor site morbidity, sensation, and unrestricted hand function with early mobilization [16], [17]. Another point that should be emphasized may be the technical details that should be considered during flap harvest. The loose subcutaneous tissues with the dorsal superficial venous system must be included in the pedicle, and flap transfer to the recipient area must be accomplished without tension otherwise venous outflow may be compromised [16]. Moreover, it was reported that even if the arterial pedicle of the flap was injured, the flap might survive thanks to this exclusively venous pedicle. Care must be taken as dissection approaches the dorsum of the MP joint because in this area of very thin subcutaneous tissue, the delicate arteries are susceptible to injury and decreasing caliber of the vessels may not allow a safe dissection. The incorporation of fascia overlying the first dorsal interosseous muscle to the pedicle is of great importance in order to avoid unintentional injury to the pedicle artey. An important advantage of this flap is that it provides sensation [16], [17], [18]. The nerve enters the flap lateral to the MP joint and superficial to the extensor apparatus. A sensate thumb is of utmost importance for a functioning hand. Although it was less than the ulnar ring finger, island flaps had respective two-point discrimination of 13–15, 12–15 mm, better than the usual acceptable two-point discrimination of 15 mm [18]. It was reported that brain adaptation to new sensation pattern takes 2–3 months [18]. Our patients were informed about the sensation pattern that was of the donor site and usually adapted well within 3–4 months. Limited size of the flap, between the PIP joint and MP joint, may be regarded as a restrictive factor for its use for extensive soft tissue defects [31]. Although size between these two joints may vary depending on the length of patient's index finger, in our cases, the largest flap was 3 × 5.5 cm. When the dimensions of the defect exceed the limits of the flap size, coverage of exposed anatomic structures is the priority, and the remaining defect may alternatively be resurfaced with full-thickness skin grafts. Additionally, donor site morbidity may be criticized in terms of both cosmetic and functional concerns with possible restriction of extensor tendon gliding under the skin graft [17]. Sparing the paratenon over the extansor apparatus during flap harvest is important to avoid this complication. On the dorsal aspect of the index finger, well-maturated full thickness skin graft was found to be cosmetically acceptable by all of the patients. Conclusively, in reconstruction of post-deformities involving the thumb and/or adjacent web and thenar area, FDMA flap is a reliable local neurovascular island flap option, offering a good functional and acceptable cosmetic outcome with sensation, elasticity and durability. References  [1]. [1]Pruitt BA. Epidemiology and general considerations. In: Salisbury RD, editor. Burns of the upper extremity. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; p. 1. [2]. [2]Aucher BM. The burned hand. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, editors. Green's hand operative hand surgery, 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; p. 2045. [3]. [3]Parry S. Reconstruction of the burned hand. Clin Plast Surg. 1989;16:577–586. MEDLINE [4]. [4]Valauri FA, Buncke HJ. Thumb reconstruction—great toe transfer. Clin Plast Surg. 1989;16:475–489. MEDLINE [5]. [5]El-Gammal TA, Wei FC. Microvascular reconstruction of the distal digits by partial toe transfer. Clin Plast Surg. 1997;24:49–55. MEDLINE [6]. [6]Isık S, Er E, Uygur F, Nisanci M. Repair of thumb abduction contracture by microsurgical transfer of partial toe. Burns. 2002;28:486–489. Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (333 KB)
|
CrossRef
[7]. [7]Hudson DA. Some thoughts on choosing a Z-plasty: the Z made simple. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:665–671. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[8]. [8]Peker F, Celebiler O. Y-V advancement with Z-plasty: an effective combined model for the release of post-burn flexion contractures of the fingers. Burns. 2003;29:479–482. Abstract | Full Text |
Full-Text PDF (247 KB)
|
CrossRef
[9]. [9]Iwuagwu F, Wilson D, Bailie F. The use of skin grafts in post-burn contracture release: a 10-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1198–1204. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[10]. [10]Eaton CJ, Lister GD. Treatment of skin and soft tissue loss of the thumb. Hand Clinics. 1992;8:71–83. MEDLINE [11]. [11]Foucher G, Khouri RK. Digital reconstruction with island flaps. Clin Plast Surg. 1997;24:1–26. MEDLINE [12]. [12]Darragh EH. Neurovascular pedicle and advancement flaps for palmar thumb defects. Hand Clinics. 1997;13:207–215. MEDLINE [13]. [13]Foucher G, Van Genechten F. Neurovascular skin kite flap from the index finger. In: Strauch B, Vasconez LO, Hall-Findlay EJ, editors. Grabb's encylopedia of flaps, 1st ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; p, 942. [14]. [14]Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Reconstructive surgery, principles, anatomy and technique. 1st ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997;. [15]. [15]Foucher GD, Braun JB. The new island flap transfer from the dorsum of the index to the thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:344–349. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[16]. [16]Rybka FJ, Pratt FE. Thumb reconstruction with a sensory flap from the dorsum of the index finger. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;64:141. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[17]. [17]Yang JY. The first dorsal metacarpal flap in first web space and thumb reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;27:258. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[18]. [18]Small JO, Brennen MD. The first dorsal metacarpal artery neurovascular island flap. J Hand Surg. 1988;13:136–138. [19]. [19]Salisbury RE. Reconstruction of the burned hand. Clin Plast Surg. 2000;27:65–69. MEDLINE [20]. [20]Smith MA, Munster AM, Spence RJ. Burns of the hand and upperlimb. Burns. 1998;24:493–505. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (8165 KB)
|
CrossRef
[21]. [21]Verdan C. The reconstruction of the thumb. Surg Clin North Am. 1968;48:1033–1061. MEDLINE [22]. [22]Hentz VR. Conventional techniques for thumb reconstruction. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1985;195:129–134. [23]. [23]Lister G. The choice of procedure following thumb amputation. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1985;195:45–58. [24]. [24]Foucher G, Moss AL. Microvascular second toe-to-finger transfer: a statistical analysis of 55 transfers. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:87–93. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (512 KB)
|
CrossRef
[25]. [25]Gaul JS. Radial-innervated cross-finger flap from index to provide sensory pulp to injured thumb. J Bone Joint Surg. 1969;51:1257–1258. MEDLINE [26]. [26]Earley MJ, Milner RH. Dorsal metacarpal flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40:333–336. Abstract |
Full-Text PDF (1195 KB)
|
CrossRef
[27]. [27]Littler JW. The neurovascular pedicle method of digital transposition for reconstruction of the thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1953;12:303–306. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[28]. [28]Brunelli F, Vigasso A, Valenti P, Brunelli GR. Arterial anatomy and clinical application of the dorsoulnar flap of the thumb. J Hand Surg. 1999;24:801–803. [29]. [29]Tezcan M, Özcan M, Kahveci R, Safak E, Akın S. New flap from the dorsum of the first intermetacarpal area: the first dorsal intermetacarpal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:914–917. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
[30]. [30]Gaul JS, Charlotte NC. A palmar-hinged flap for reconstruction of traumatic thumb defects. J Hand Surg. 1987;12:415–421. [31]. [31]Gebhard B, Meissl G. An extended first dorsal metacarpal artey neurovascular island flap. J. Hand Surg (Br). 1995;20:529–532. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, 06018 Etlik, Ankara, Turkey Correspondence to: GATA, Plastik, Rekonstruktif ve Estetik Cerrahi AD, 06018 Etlik, Ankara, Turkey. Tel.: +90 312 304 5401; fax: +90 312 304 5404.
PII: S0305-4179(06)00157-4 doi:10.1016/j.burns.2006.04.030 © 2006 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved. | |
|