Journal Home
Search for

Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 52-58 (February 2007)


View previous. 11 of 30 View next.

The effect of treating infected skin grafts with Acticoat™ on immune cells

Vera C. MazurakaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Robert E. Burrellbc, Edward E. Tredgetd, M. Thomas Clandininae, Catherine J. Fieldae

Accepted 25 April 2006.

Abstract 

A study was conducted to determine the effect of Acticoat™ placed on an infected skin graft on parameters of immunity. Two partial thickness wounds (2cm×4cm) were created on the dorsal midline of Hartley guinea pigs (n=28). Wounds were covered with autologous skin graft and maintained either aseptically (Noninoculated, n=8), inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus (Surgery-Inoculated, n=8) with or without Acticoat™ bandage (Surgery-Inoculated-Acticoat, n=6). Five days later, splenocytes and blood were collected to estimate natural killer cell (NK) cytotoxicity, proliferative response to T and B cell mitogens and neutrophil oxidative burst. Animals that did not undergo surgery were included as a nonsurgery control group. [3H]-thymidine incorporation in response to a variety of T and B cell mitogens was significantly lower for all groups undergoing surgery compared to the nonsurgery control group (p<0.0001) and no additional effect was observed on this immune measure by applying the Acticoat bandage. The Surgery-Inoculated-Acticoat group exhibited greater NK cytotoxic activity (as assessed as the ability to lyse K562 tumor cells) compared to the Surgery-Inoculated group (p<0.006). The Surgery-Inoculated-Acticoat group had higher neutrophil oxidative burst at 5min post stimulation, but was not different from controls after 15min. In conclusion, the application of an Acticoat™ bandage to an inoculated surgery wound did not alter the low cell-mediated immune response that followed surgery, but appeared to increase parameters (NK cytotoxic activity and neutrophil function) of innate immunity.

a Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada T6G 2P5

b Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada

c Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada

d Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery and Critical Care, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada

e Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 780 492 8048; fax: +1 780 492 4265.

PII: S0305-4179(06)00162-8

doi:10.1016/j.burns.2006.04.027


View previous. 11 of 30 View next.