Journal Home
Search for

Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 1112-1117 (December 2009)


View previous. 9 of 30 View next.

Twenty-five year epidemiology of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates recovered at a burn center

Clinton K. MurrayabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Robert L. Holmesc, Michael W. Ellisb, Katrin Mendead, Steven E. Wolfe, Linda K. McDougalf, Charles H. Guymone, Duane R. Hospenthalab

Accepted 12 February 2009.

Abstract 

Over the past two decades, an epidemiologic emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has occurred from that of primarily hospital-associated to community-associated. This emergence change has involved MRSA of different pulsed-field types (PFT), with different virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance patterns. In this study we, evaluate the changes in PFT and antimicrobial resistance epidemiology of invasive MRSA isolates over 25 years at a single burn unit. Isolates were tested by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and PCR for the virulence factors Panton–Valentine leukocidin (PVL) and arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME), and the resistance marker staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec). Forty isolates were screened, revealing stable vancomycin susceptibility MIC without changes over time but decreasing susceptibility to clindamycin and ciprofloxacin. The majority of PFGE types were MRSA USA800 carrying the SCCmec I element and USA100 carrying the SCCmec II element. No strains typically associated with community-associated MRSA, USA300 or USA400, were found. USA800 isolates were predominately found in the 1980s, USA600 isolates were primarily found in the 1990s, and USA100 isolates were found in the 2000s. The PVL gene was present in only one isolate, the sole USA500 isolate, from 1987. The virulence marker ACME was not detected in any of the isolates. Overall, a transition was found in hospital-associated MRSA isolates over the 25 years, but no introduction of community-associated MRSA isolates into this burn unit. Continued active surveillance and aggressive infection control strategies are recommended to prevent the spread of community-acquired MRSA to this burn unit.

a Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA

b Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA

c Keesler Medical Center, Biloxi, MS, USA

d Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Bethesda, MD, USA

e United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA

f Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Infectious Disease Service, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA. Tel.: +1 210 916 8752; fax: +1 210 916 0388.

 The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services or the US government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties and, as such, there is no copyright to be transferred.

PII: S0305-4179(09)00073-4

doi:10.1016/j.burns.2009.02.013


View previous. 9 of 30 View next.