Burns
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 647-658, August 2010

Multi-modal distraction. Using technology to combat pain in young children with burn injuries

  • Kate Miller

      Affiliations

    • Burns Research Group, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
    • The University of Queensland, School of Health & Rehabilitation, Division of Occupational Therapy, Brisbane, Australia
    • Department of Occupational Therapy, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
    • The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Brisbane, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: University of Queensland, Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, Level 3 Foundation Building, Royal Children's Hospital, Herston Rd, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia. Tel.: +61 7401260662; fax: +61 733655455.
  • ,
  • Sylvia Rodger

      Affiliations

    • The University of Queensland, School of Health & Rehabilitation, Division of Occupational Therapy, Brisbane, Australia
  • ,
  • Sam Bucolo

      Affiliations

    • The Queensland University of Technology, School of Design, Brisbane, Australia
  • ,
  • Ristan Greer

      Affiliations

    • The University of Queensland, School of Veterinary Science, Division of Epidemiology, Brisbane, Australia
  • ,
  • Roy M. Kimble

      Affiliations

    • Burns Research Group, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
    • The University of Queensland, School of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Brisbane, Australia

Accepted 1 June 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The use of non-pharmacological pain management remains adhoc within acute paediatric burns pain management protocols despite ongoing acknowledgement of its role. Advancements in adult based pain services including the integration of virtual reality has been adapted to meet the needs of children in pain, as exemplified by the development of multi-modal distraction (MMD). This easy to use, hand held interactive device uses customised programs designed to inform the child about the procedure he/she is about to experience and to distract the child during dressing changes.

Aim

(1) To investigate if either MMD procedural preparation (MMD-PP) or distraction (MMD-D) has a greater impact on child pain reduction compared to standard distraction (SD) or hand held video game distraction (VG), (2) to understand the impact of MMD-PP and MMD-D on clinic efficiency by measuring length of treatment across groups, and lastly, (3) to assess the efficacy of distraction techniques over three dressing change procedures.

Methods

A prospective randomised control trial was completed in a paediatric tertiary hospital Burns Outpatient Clinic. Eighty participants were recruited and studied over their first three dressing changes. Pain was assessed using validated child report, caregiver report, nursing observation and physiological measures.

Results

MMD-D and MMD-PP were both shown to significantly relieve reported pain (p0.05) and reduce the time taken for dressings (p0.05) compared to SD and VG. The positive effects of both MMD-D and MMD-PP were sustained with subsequent dressing changes.

Conclusions

The use of MMD as a preparatory or a distraction tool in an outpatient burns clinic offered superior pain reduction across three dressing changes to children when compared to standard practices or hand held video games. This device has the potential to improve clinic efficiency with reductions in treatment lengths.

Keywords: Pain, Virtual reality, Multi-modal distraction, Paediatric, Burns

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0305-4179(09)00403-3

doi:10.1016/j.burns.2009.06.199

Burns
Volume 36, Issue 5 , Pages 647-658, August 2010