Burns
Volume 36, Issue 6 , Pages 780-786, September 2010

A reliable and valid outcome battery for measuring recovery of lower limb function and balance after burn injury

  • Vidya Finlay

      Affiliations

    • Western Australian Burns Service, Royal Perth Hospital, McComb Foundation of WA, Australia
    • ,
  • Michael Phillips

      Affiliations

    • Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia, Australia
    • ,
  • Fiona Wood

      Affiliations

    • Western Australian Burns Service, Royal Perth Hospital, McComb Foundation of WA, University of Western Australia, Australia
    • ,
  • Dale Edgar

      Affiliations

    • Western Australian Burns Service, Royal Perth Hospital, McComb Foundation of WA, University of Western Australia, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Tel.:stra Burns Outcome Centre, Level 11 – Wellington St Campus, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia 6847, Australia. Tel.: +61 8 9224 3566; fax: +61 8 9224 3577.

Accepted 20 October 2009.

Abstract 

Introduction

The measurement of recovery after burns to the lower limbs is hampered by an absence validated injury specific tools. This research aimed to select and validate a battery of outcome measures of recovery after lower limb burn injury (LLBI).

Method

Reliability study: Reliability of the single leg stance (SLS), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and the tandem walk (TW) tests were measured using a test–retest trial involving 28 patients with LLBI. Validity study: Clinical data from 172 patients with LLBI were used to compare changes in each LL outcome measure with changes in the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B).

Results

All tests, except the SLS test with eyes closed, demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (ICCs=0.81–0.93). The TUG and the TW-forwards tests were shown to be valid and to provide additional information to the BSHS-B when combined as a battery. The TW-backwards test was redundant while the SLS and ankle DF measures did not correlate highly with the BSHS-B.

Conclusion

This study shows that the TUG test and the TWF are reliable and valid in the burns population and along with the BSHS-B form a useful test battery for measuring recovery from LLBI.

Keywords: Burns, Balance, Reliability, Battery, Recovery, Outcome

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0305-4179(09)00541-5

doi:10.1016/j.burns.2009.10.019

Burns
Volume 36, Issue 6 , Pages 780-786, September 2010

Article Tools