Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from burn units in Gaza
Introduction
Burns infection remains the leading cause of morbidity and death among burn patients [1], [2]. As a result of significant improvements of surgical treatments and intensive care in burn wards, it seems that infection is the direct cause of nearly 75% of deaths following burn [3], [4], [5]. Most of the infections are thought to be of nosocomial origin [6]. Infection in the wound prolongs the healing process; treatment includes rational antibiotic administration, removal of necrotic tissues, sufficient blood and oxygen supply to the wound and good nutritional support. All these measures are very important in the care of burn victims [7]. The spectrum of pathogenic bacteria on burn wounds varies in the course of burn treatment [8]. Health care workers (HCWs) move from patient to patient thus providing a means for pathogens to spread perhaps related to sanitation protocols regarding uniforms, equipment sterilization, washing and other preventive measures. Lastly, the routine use of antimicrobial agents in hospitals creates selection pressure for the emergence of the resistant strains of microorganisms [9].
The increase of multi-drug resistant (MDR) strains among the clinical isolates has further limited the therapeutic options [10]. It is therefore necessary to carry out periodic monitoring of patterns of isolation and susceptibility profiles of microorganisms in burn wounds in order to modify the preventive and therapeutic strategies. This especially is of utmost importance because regional variation in the type and susceptibility profiles exists. Colonization rates in burn patients from Gaza strip have been rarely reported and according to our best knowledge there is no documented reports or published scientific work. Furthermore, there is no data concerning the antimicrobial drug resistance of burn infections pathogens.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance among pathogens isolated from burn patients and burn unit environment from the two burn units in Gaza strip, Palestine. It is worth mentioning that burn wound colonization does not necessarily mean disease, however, burn wound colonization is a risk factor for clinical disease. Positive cultures in this study indicate colonization.
Section snippets
Setting and patients
This prospective cross-sectional study involved 118 patients who were admitted to the burn units of Al-Shifa (94) and Nasser (24) hospital during the period from October 2010 to March 2011. Any repeat sample or isolate obtained on more than one occasion from the same patient was excluded. The study design was approved by Helsinki committee and an informed consent was obtained from participating patients and HCWs.
Sample collection
The total number of burn wound swabs was 118 (Al-Shifa 94 and Nasser 24). The
Results
The overall percentage of positive cultures from both hospitals was 45.8%. In Al-Shifa burn unit the negative cultures account for 60.6% in comparison to 39.4% positive cultures while, Nasser burn unit showed higher percentage of positive cultures (70.8%). From the 97 different environmental samples that have been investigated, there were 23 (23.7%) positive samples from both burn units.
A total of 138 bacterial isolates were recovered from various sources in burn units including patients. The
Discussion
The present study is the first that attempts to isolate and characterize the possible etiological bacterial pathogens from burn patients and their environment in the two main burn units in Gaza strip. In this study we aimed not only to present the type and frequencies of the bacterial genera present in burn patients and that present in their environment, but also we tested its antimicrobial resistance profile against most used antibiotics at our burn units in order to modify the preventive and
Conclusion
P. aeruginosa (50%), was the most common isolated bacteria in this study and patients isolates were all considered as MDR and suspected to be clonal identical according to its antimicrobial resistant profiles. Higher rates were demonstrated in the Nasser hospital burn unit. Periodic monitoring of patterns of isolation and susceptibility profiles of pathogens in our burn units should be performed regularly in order to find out the best preventive and therapeutic strategies.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References (30)
- et al.
Colonization of burns and the duration of hospital stay of severely burned patients
J Hospital Infect
(1992) - et al.
Bacteriology of burns
Burns
(1998) - et al.
Infection control in burn patients
Clin Plast Surg
(1986) - et al.
Aerobic bacterial isolates from burn wound infections and their antibiograms – a five year study
Mol Biol Rep
(2004) - et al.
Burn epidemiology: the pink city scene
Burns
(1993) - et al.
Changes of microbial flora and wound colonization in burned patients
Burns
(2004) - et al.
Comparative evaluation of surface swab and quantitative full thickness wound biopsy culture in burn patients
Burns
(2007) - et al.
Identification of pathogenic bacteria in blood cultures: comparison between conventional and PCR methods
J Microbiol Methods
(2009) - et al.
Nosocomial infections in an Iranian burn care center
Burns
(2000) - et al.
Risk factors for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa nosocomial infection
J Hosp Infect
(2004)
Pediatric burn injuries in Tehran, Iran
Burns
Microbiologic aspects of predominant bacteria isolated from the burn patients in Korea
Burns
Analysis of infection in a burn ward
Burns
Predominance of staphylococcal organisms in infections occurring in a burns intensive care unit
Burns
Intensive care management and control of infection
Mol Biol Rep
Cited by (22)
Preparation and characterization of a gallium-loaded antimicrobial artificial dermal scaffold
2019, Materials Science and Engineering CCitation Excerpt :In recent years, there have been a number of reports and clinical studies regarding the prevention of implant infections, such as antimicrobial coatings [9,10] or photocatalytic materials [11] or gentamicin controlled release [12], which also include metallic antimicrobial modification strategies using metals such as silver [13], zinc [14] and copper [15]. Since heavy antibiotic use has greatly increased antibiotic resistance [16], inorganic antimicrobials possess the advantages of susceptibility to a wide spectrum of bacteria, and less vulnerability to acquired resistance [17]. Gallium and gallium-containing compounds are metallic antimicrobials whose significant inhibitory activity against numerous bacteria has been confirmed [18–20].
Antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes profiling of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a burn center: A 5-year study
2018, Microbial PathogenesisCitation Excerpt :Timely and correct application of antimicrobials is very important for anti-S. aureus therapy, especially in burn patients, isolates from whom usually display serious antimicrobial resistance [10,11]. Therefore, empirical antimicrobial application is vital for infection control before clinicians get the outcome of susceptibility test.
Synthesis, antibacterial and QSAR evaluation of 5-oxo and 5-thio derivatives of 1,4-disubstituted tetrazoles
2015, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry LettersAntibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Calcite (CaCO<inf>3</inf>) Nanoparticles Synthesized from Chicken Eggshell
2023, The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine