Elsevier

Burns

Volume 40, Issue 3, May 2014, Pages 529-531
Burns

Letter to the Editor
Controversial Liverpool Care Pathway withdrawn in the United Kingdom after official government review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.10.006Get rights and content

Section snippets

Training, quality, communication and accountability

These problems include firstly, training, in order to prevent the misuses of the LCP, it's essential that all burn care professionals using end of life tools know the principles of how they should be used [1], [2], [4], [7], [8]. Secondly, quality – some of the incentives for hospitals to use the LCP are said to have rewarded a purely numerical increase in use of the LCP, with little way to ensure it is increasing quality rather than simply quantity [7], [8], [17]. This must be addressed in any

Contribution to authorship

Sammy Al-Benna acquired, analysed and interpreted the data, wrote and approved the final version of the manuscript to be submitted. Ciaran O’Boyle analysed and interpreted the data, wrote and finalised the manuscript, read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be submitted.

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any financial and personal relationships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) this work.

Funding

None.

Cited by (3)

  • Palliation, end-of-life care and burns; concepts, decision-making and communication – A narrative review

    2020, African Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Two articles were found that discussed palliative care in burn patients, one discussing terminal extubation in the ventilated burn patient [12], the other proposing a variation of the Liverpool Care Pathway for burn patients but providing little detail [13]. The Liverpool Care Pathway has – since the publication of this study - come under investigation [14], and the remainder of the literature exists in a number of letters arising from this discussion [15,16]. The existing literature therefore does not lend itself to a systematic or resource-tiered review and therefore the format of a narrative review was chosen.

View full text