Elsevier

Burns

Volume 44, Issue 3, May 2018, Pages 512-523
Burns

Review
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of first aid interventions for burns given to caregivers of children: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2017.05.022Get rights and content

Highlights

  • There is the lack of systematic reviews in this field of research.

  • A paucity of high quality research.

  • Delivery and content of first aid interventions varied.

  • Available burns first aid intervention use demonstrated a positive effect on knowledge and healthcare utilization.

  • Promising results imply urgent actions in terms of conducting high quality clinical trials to inform evidence-based practice.

Abstract

Objectives

the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of burns first-aid educational interventions given to caregivers of children.

Methods

Systematic review of eligible studies from seven databases, international journals, trials repositories and contacted international experts.

Results

Of 985 potential studies, four met the inclusion criteria. All had high risk of bias and weak global rating.

Two studies identified a statistically significant increase in knowledge after of a media campaign. King et al. (41.7% vs 63.2%, p < 0.0001), Skinner et al. (59% vs 40%, p = 0.004). Skinner et al. also identified fewer admissions (64.4% vs 35.8%, p < 0.001) and surgical procedures (25.6% vs 11.4%, p < 0.001).

Kua et al. identified a significant improvement in caregiver’s knowledge (22.9% vs 78.3%, 95% CI 49.2, 61.4) after face-to-face education intervention. Ozyazicioglu et al. evaluated the effect of a first-aid training program and showed a reduction in use of harmful traditional methods for burns in children (29% vs 16.1%, p < 0.001).

No data on cost-effectiveness was identified.

Conclusion

There is a paucity of high quality research in this field and considerable heterogeneity across the included studies. Delivery and content of interventions varied. However, studies showed a positive effect on knowledge. No study evaluated the direct effect of the intervention on first aid administration. High quality clinical trials are needed.

Introduction

Burns are a global public health problem. Children and young people are particularly susceptible to burn injury [1], especially infants and pre-school age children [2], [3], [4]. Infant and childhood physical and cognitive development means that they rely heavily on caregivers to ensure their safety. This reliance is important as actions and behaviours of the caregiver can impact on the prevention of burn injuries, and the appropriate early first aid of those injuries that do occur. Education of the caregiving population is crucial in the fight against and early management of paediatric burns [5].

Immediate management of the burn injury includes administering correct burns first aid. The aim of which is to stop the burning process, cool the burn, provide pain relief, and cover the burn to reduce the risk of infection [6]. Efficient and appropriate first aid administered within three hours of the injurious event can reduce burn severity, improve the clinical outcome, reduce pain, long-term morbidity [7], [8], decrease healthcare costs [9], and provide a strong protective effect for long-term burn-related physical impairments in later life [10]. For these reasons, it is essential that appropriate burns first aid health education is given to the caregiver based on simple, reliable and evidence-based information [11]. In recent years, epidemiological studies have highlighted that awareness, knowledge and practice of burns first aid is low amongst caregivers worldwide [12], [13], [14], [15]. As a result, there is often an inadequate mechanism and duration of cooling [16], [17], [18], or the application of natural plant therapies, oils, honey, eggs or butter directly to the wound [19]. Many of these traditional and home remedies are self-perpetuating and generational unless interventional education is provided [19].

Confusion over appropriate first aid may be influenced by the varied recommendations and guidelines advocated by different organisations, various media [20], [21] and incorrect advice provided by family and friends. The volume of information available on burns first aid is extensive and easily accessible, however its quality, accuracy and completeness can be questioned [20], [21].

The culmination of such research suggests a need for educational programs to address these issues. However, a research gap exists in ascertaining the most effective method of intervention delivery. The following systematic review aims to identify published evidence to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different methods for delivering burns first aid education interventions to caregivers of children across all settings.

Section snippets

Methods

We searched seven databases including Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, AMED, and ERIC for studies published in any language from inception to 31 July 2016 using both subject headings and key words. We searched three major clinical trials repositories (Clinicaltrials.gov (NIH web); Current controlled trials (www.controlled-trials.com); Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.anzctr.org.au); and key journals including Burns; Journal of Burn Care

Study selection

The searches yielded 985 potentially eligible studies, from which three studies met the inclusion criteria (see PRISMA diagram, Fig. 1). One further study was found from hand searches of journals [23]. Searching the references cited by the identified studies, three major clinical trials repositories and contacting international experts in this field of research for on-going or un-published work did not reveal any further studies.

Characteristics of the included studies

Detailed characteristics of the included studies are provided in

Discussion

We identified only four studies in this field of research. Overall, the body of evidence from these studies was considered weak, but did show significant short-term improvements in first aid knowledge post educational interventions. Included studies applied different techniques for delivering the intervention, taught different first aid methods and evaluated different outcomes. Study populations were generally small and represented high-risk groups in the community or clinical setting. The weak

Conclusion

Although there is a paucity of evidence in this area, the findings support a positive role of educational intervention for burns first aid. However, there is insufficient data to judge the quality or strength of evidence to support the effectiveness of interventions in practice. Burns first aid interventions were vaguely specified and described, included studies were small and of poor methodological quality making it difficult to offer any definitive recommendations.

Future research should focus

Contributorship

Ulugbek Nurmatov (UN) and Alison Kemp (AK) conceived the idea for this review and together with Stephen Mullen (SM), Harriet Quinn-Scoggins (HQS), and Mala Mann (MM) formulated the review protocol. UN and MM conducted searches, UN and SM screened, extracted, tabulated and appraised data, UN, SM, and HQS drafted this manuscript, with all co-authors commented on the drafts of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all international experts in this field of research that we contacted and the National Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research for funding the lead authors post and the Scar Free Foundation for funding SM and HQS as researchers within the Children’s Burns Research Network.

References (32)

  • L. Cuttle et al.

    The optimal duration and delay of first aid treatments for deep partial thickness burn injuries

    Burns

    (2010)
  • S. Saturni et al.

    Randomized controlled trials and real life studies. Approaches and methodologies: a clinical point of view

    Pulm Pharmacol Ther

    (2014)
  • World Health Organisation (WHO)

    Violence and injury prevention: burns

    (2016)
  • J. Delgado et al.

    Risk factors for burns in children: crowding, poverty, and poor maternal education

    Inj Prev

    (2002)
  • A.M. Kemp et al.

    Patterns of burns and scalds in children

    Arch Dis Child

    (2014)
  • http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/69871/1/WHO_NMH_VIP08.01_eng.pdf. [Accessed 23 January...
  • Cited by (7)

    • Effective communication with caregivers to prevent unintentional injuries in children under seven years. A systematic review

      2022, Patient Education and Counseling
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, previous reviews on interventions provide only superficial information on these different forms of communication. They refer to communication-based interventions, for example as “delivery strategies” [19], “education” [19–25] or “educational intervention” [26–28], but do not provide sufficient information on the content and type of communication. A few reviews differentiated between presentation forms such as “leaflets”, “stickers”, and “posters” [20], “promotion materials”, “oral presentations”, “videos”, and “mass media” [29] or distinguished between “targeted” and “mass media education” [23], but failed to elaborate on message content, message attributes, communication channels, and communicators explicitly.

    • Evaluating parental knowledge of pediatric burns first aid in Ireland and the effectiveness of an educational intervention improving knowledge

      2022, Burns
      Citation Excerpt :

      There has been limited research into interventions on burns first aid for parents. A recent systematic review found only four studies conducted previously [32]. One study in Singapore tested a short educational intervention based on a pictorial guide, and found a statistically significant increase in knowledge among caregivers immediately following education [33].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text