Elsevier

Burns

Volume 42, Issue 7, November 2016, Pages e99-e106
Burns

Case report
Second-degree burns with six etiologies treated with autologous noncultured cell-spray grafting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.02.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Use of autologous cell-spray grafting to treat deep partial-thickness burn wounds was tested.

  • We used a three-step enzymatic process for skin cell isolation (non-cultured cells).

  • We performed a retrospective analysis of six patients with different burn etiologies.

  • We will use the data for planning clinical studies in the field.

Abstract

Partial and deep partial-thickness burn wounds present a difficult diagnosis and prognosis that makes the planning for a conservative treatment versus mesh grafting problematic. A non-invasive treatment strategy avoiding mesh grafting is often chosen by practitioners based on their clinical and empirical evidence. However, a delayed re-epithelialization after conservative treatment may extend the patient's hospitalization period, increase the risk of infection, and lead to poor functional and aesthetic outcome. Early spray grafting, using non-cultured autologous cells, is under discussion for partial and deep partial-thickness wounds to accelerate the re-epithelialization process, reducing the healing time in the hospital, and minimizing complications. To address planning for future clinical studies on this technology, suitable indications will be interesting. We present case information on severe second-degree injuries after gas, chemical, electrical, gasoline, hot water, and tar scalding burns showing one patient per indication. The treatment results with autologous non-cultured cells, support rapid, uncomplicated re-epithelialization with aesthetically and functionally satisfying outcomes. Hospital stays averaged 7.6 ± 1.6 days. Early autologous cell-spray grafting does not preclude or prevent simultaneous or subsequent traditional mesh autografting when indicated on defined areas of full-thickness injury.

Introduction

The initial clinical diagnosis of a burn wound depth usually determines the treatment, however, intermediate partial thickness burns can be difficult to classify accurately with an early evaluation [1]. Deeper partial-thickness injuries may need to undergo surgical treatment, including excision and optional split-skin mesh grafting [1], [2], [3]. Conservative treatment of extensive, deep partial-thickness wounds avoids early mesh grafting at the risk of a delay in wound closure, which may result in infection and poor aesthetic and functional outcomes. Possible complications of this therapeutic approach include hypertrophic scarring, contracture, and poor functional and aesthetic outcomes that could result in a reduced range of motion and unsatisfactory psychosocial adjustment [4]. Thus, in this borderline indication, an early autologous cell-spray grafting of extensive, deep partial-thickness wounds could be an interesting therapeutic option [5]. In addition, an enlargement of the donor-to-graft-area ratio from a routine 3:1 has its typical clinical limitation at 6:1, while using cell-spray grafting the ratio is between 20:1 and 80:1 [6], [7].

Skin regeneration is a dynamic process that involves different cell lineages and cell signaling, which leads progenitors cells to restore the tissue structure and function [8]. Epidermal burn-wound regeneration starts from the edge of the wound where the epidermal structures remain. The adjacent epidermis contains all different functional structures including the hair follicle (HF), inter follicular epidermis (IFE), and the sebaceous glands that are involved in the healing process [9], [10], [11]. Epidermal homeostasis and regeneration are enabled by quiescent epidermal stem cells (Fig. 1A), some of which can be activated and proliferate as transient amplified keratinocytes in the Stratum basale [12], [13]. Through post-mitotic differentiation and migration, cells from the basal layer can regenerate the entirely stratified epidermis [10], [14], [15], [16], [17]. In deep partial-thickness burn wounds, mesh and cell-spray grafting aim to distribute these cells over the center of the wound and speed up central re-epithelialization.

Various cell-spray grafting methods have been introduced and are thought to provide a fast re-epithelialization and then reduce the healing time and minimize complications [5], [18], [19]. This innovative technique is still under clinical evaluation and to address planned future clinical studies, suitable indications are of interest. Since 2008, skin-cell-spray grafting, using isolated non-cultured autologous keratinocytes (Fig. 1B), has been used at our center as a treatment option for 45 partial-thickness burn patients. Our chosen regulatory Innovative Practice Institutional Review Board (IRB) approach precludes a study with controls. At times, the procedure has been used in combination with mesh grafting for patients with combined second- and third-degree burn wounds. Here, we present six second-degree burn patients and their treatments, showing different burn etiologies: gas, chemical, electrical, gasoline, hot water, and tar (Table 1). In all indications, the results, after early autologous cell-spray grafting shows a fast re-epithelialization and an aesthetic and functionally satisfying outcome with no major complications. We suggest considering these indications for future clinical studies in this new field.

Section snippets

Patient criteria for study inclusion

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) from UPMC Mercy Hospital, through its Technology and Innovative Practice Assessment Committee, approved the cell-based grafting procedures under an innovative practice approach. Therefore, performing a clinical study with controls was not possible. Patient data collection for this retrospective analysis was performed under an authorization from the Institutional Review Board (IRB# PRO14010023, 23-01). Exclusion criteria for the treatment consisted of age <18

Results

Here, we present the individual clinical treatment of six patients, each with a different burn etiology, treated with cell-spray grafting:

Discussion

The clinical results of burn trauma, depending on the burn area, are often devastating and may be complicated or fatal [21]. In the USA, more than 1.25 million burns are reported per year. The NIH spends about 6.5 million dollars annually on patients wound healing projects and an excess of 25 billion is spent annually on wound treatment [22], [23]. Although cultured epidermal autografts (CEA) have been available in burn therapy for some time, the waiting time associated with the process can be

Conflict of interest

J.G. and R.E. have a financial interest in the spray-grafting device technologies through payments of RenovaCare, NY.

Author contributions

R.E. coordinated the cell-isolation process and the follow-up, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. J.G. and R.E designed and coordinated the manuscript design and revised the manuscript. M.C. compiled the medical records data, provided advice and revised the manuscript. M.Y. and P.O. performed the cell isolations. A.C., J.Z designed the manuscript structure, performed the cell-spray procedure and the patient follow-up. M.Y., M.C., A.C., J.Z. revised the manuscript and provided discussions.

Acknowledgments

This work was sponsored by UPMC and through gifts from RenovaCare, based in New York, NY, and the Ladies Hospital Aid Society (LHAS) through their Innovation Award (2013). We also thank Jim Harris for text corrections and editing and Dan McKeel for his help and expertise in fabricating the skin gun disposable parts.

References (27)

  • D. Jackson et al.

    Primary excision and grafting of large burns

    Ann Surg

    (1960)
  • C. Balakrishnan et al.

    The effect of partial-thickness facial burns on social functioning

    J Burn Care Rehabil

    (1999)
  • J.C. Tanner et al.

    Large-mesh skin grafts

    Plast Reconstr Surg

    (1969)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Advances in spray products for skin regeneration

      2022, Bioactive Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cell spray autografting is an innovative technique still under clinical evaluation, consisting of taking autologous skin cells from a small biopsy of undamaged skin of the patient and either spraying the cells directly over the wound or culturing them to amplify their number before spraying. In comparison to traditional sheet autografts, cell spray autografting is a simple and cost-effective method, it avoids blister formation and needs a much smaller donor site, therefore reducing healing time and minimizing complications [12,140]. Epithelial cells can be sprayed uniformly, remain viable and proliferate on the wound bed, achieving a fast re-epithelialization, which is important for a good functionality and esthetic outcome, particularly in large wounds and in joint areas [12,21,23,140].

    • Cell-spray auto-grafting technology for deep partial-thickness burns: Problems and solutions during clinical implementation

      2018, Burns
      Citation Excerpt :

      This method provides an on-site cell isolation process followed by the immediate application of autologous stem and progenitor cells to a freshly debrided wound bed. Cells in a saline suspension are sprayed uniformly across the wound bed to proliferate and accelerate the re-epithelialization process [17–19]. Cell-spray autografting does not preclude traditional mesh autografting, if used subsequently, and therefore could be a good early solution to address the therapeutic dilemmas attendant to deep partial-thickness burns.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text