Elsevier

Burns

Volume 43, Issue 5, August 2017, Pages 1051-1069
Burns

Human survival in volcanic eruptions: Thermal injuries in pyroclastic surges, their causes, prognosis and emergency management

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2017.01.025Get rights and content

Abstract

This study of burns patients from two eruptions of Merapi volcano, Java, in 1994 and 2010, is the first detailed analysis to be reported of thermal injuries in a large series of hospitalised victims of pyroclastic surges, one of the most devastating phenomena in explosive eruptions. Emergency planners in volcanic crises in populated areas have to integrate the health sector into disaster management and be aware of the nature of the surge impacts and the types of burns victims to be expected in a worst scenario, potentially in numbers and in severity that would overwhelm normal treatment facilities. In our series, 106 patients from the two eruptions were treated in the same major hospital in Yogyakarta and a third of these survived. Seventy-eight per cent were admitted with over 40% TBSA (total body surface area) burns and around 80% of patients were suspected of having at least some degree of inhalation injury as well. Thirty five patients suffered over 80% TBSA burns and only one of these survived. Crucially, 45% of patients were in the 40–79% TBSA range, with most suspected of suffering from inhalation injury, for whom survival was most dependent on the hospital treatment they received. After reviewing the evidence from recent major eruptions and outlining the thermal hazards of surges, we relate the type and severity of the injuries of these patients to the temperatures and dynamics of the pyroclastic surges, as derived from the environmental impacts and associated eruption processes evaluated in our field surveys and interviews conducted by our multi-disciplinary team. Effective warnings, adequate evacuation measures, and political will are all essential in volcanic crises in populated areas to prevent future catastrophes on this scale.

Introduction

Combating the human and economic losses of natural disasters is an ever-present global challenge to ensure that appropriate mitigation measures, such as warnings and evacuation responses, are in place to protect vulnerable populations. Hazardous volcanic eruptions are an important element of the global challenge [1], and yet their sporadic occurrence and the scarcity of study opportunities imposes limits on the available evidence base needed for an effective management of their human impacts. In addition, there is limited experience and mixed results in most volcanic areas of managing volcanic emergencies when eruptions are so uncommon. The main problem in decision-making lies in forecasting the type, magnitude and timing of destructive explosive eruptions, which may be fraught with uncertainty, even with high-quality scientific monitoring, and thus there is risk of evacuation being fatally delayed and incurring mass casualties suffering from severe thermal injuries. This paper summarises the experience from recent explosive eruptions, highlighting at Merapi volcano, Java, the hazards of unchecked population expansion in active volcanic regions, and the unique challenge volcanic disasters may present for emergency burns management.

Volcanism with its eruptions – violent fluxes of matter (magma) and energy (heat) – remains an integral part of the Earth’s physical and biological evolution, as well as its planetary health. The global distribution of explosive volcanoes is typically related to where subduction zones exist within the grand scheme of plate tectonics where one crustal plate descends beneath another [2]. Accordingly, their greatest concentrations are found in countries around the Pacific Rim, including South and Central America, Mexico, western United States and the Aleutian arc, Kamchatka and the Kuriles, Japan and the Marianas, the Philippines, Indonesia, Melanesia, and Fiji to New Zealand. Other important clusters occur about the Mediterranean Sea, in Iceland and other islands in the Atlantic, and the West Indies [2]. Unrestricted development of settlements in regions of active volcanism is almost the norm in many of these countries, where even major cities can be at risk [3].

A wide range of human impacts may occur from the ash falls and lava flows that often accompany any eruption, but recent global eruptions confirm that pyroclastic density currents (PDCs) are the greatest threat to life [4] and thus the dominant hazard in planning for explosive volcanoes in populated areas [5]. A dilute pyroclastic density current (PDC), or surge, as we shall refer to the phenomenon here, is typically an intensely hot (200–400 °C), fast-moving cloud of fine ash and gases capable of causing devastation over wide areas extending from a few to tens of kilometres or more from the volcano [2]. Their destructiveness emanates from their high temperatures which can be extreme enough to cause built up areas to catch fire if ash gains entry to buildings and comes into contact with their combustible contents, especially when combined with the dynamic pressure of the surge front, a lateral force that can blow out openings, smash and topple structures [6].

The dense PDCs known as pyroclastic flows have undercurrents with high-particle concentrations that are almost invariably lethal to encounter, but there are examples of survival in encounters with surge eruptions and, in populated areas, mass burns casualties. With the current, rapid expansion of world populations in areas of active volcanism, this hazard needs to be more widely recognised, and hospitals prepared in the event of future volcanic crises.

The case history of the eruption at Merapi volcano, Java, in 2010 is a seminal 21st century eruption in this respect, with a population that had grown over a few decades to a million inhabitants spread over its flanks. During the course of the eruption, at least 400,000 of these were compelled to move [at very short notice] on the advice of the authorities and scientists monitoring the volcano [7], [8]. Nonetheless, over 200 people died and many others suffered thermal injuries in the erupted PDCs. The rapid and unpredictable escalation of the activity of the volcano over 11 days necessitated a phased evacuation during this period, in line with the rapidly expanding area of hazard from pyroclastic flows and surges.

We describe here the largest series of hospital-treated volcanic burns casualties to date, as collated from this event and a smaller lethal eruption of Merapi in 1994, to illustrate the nature of the hazard so that a threatened population and their officials may prepare for the risk, and to draw the attention of the health sector to the severe thermal injuries that can occur and their likely prognosis. To provide contextual background to these two eruptions, we also briefly review the evidence of impacts in recent major surges at three other important volcanoes, beginning with a summary of our understanding of how surges cause thermal injury.

Section snippets

Background

Recent research has revealed that the deaths of most victims at Pompeii and Herculaneum (Italy), the two most famous archaeological sites in the world, were caused by pyroclastic surges formed in phases during the AD 79 eruption of Vesuvius, prior to the cities being completely buried under thick volcanic deposits [9]. During the 18th century excavations, archaeologists found a way of producing plaster casts of the spaces left by the decayed bodies of the victims interred in the eruption and,

Disaster experience at Merapi volcano: hospital in-patients rescued from pyroclastic surges in 1994 and 2010

In this section we focus on our main study of casualties at Merapi, namely those who constitute the first and only available large series of surge victims in the world to survive and be treated in hospital. The series comprised burns patients from the 1994 and 2010 PDC eruptions of Merapi (Fig. 1). Most patients were treated in the same main hospital in central Yogyakarta, the Dr Sardjito, and all were transported to hospital by road. The distances to the hospital from the disaster sites in

Discussion

This investigation is one of a series of ongoing studies after major eruptions to provide an evidence base for scientists and emergency managers when planning and devising mitigation measures for future volcanic crises [5]. What distinguishes the thermal injuries in volcanic eruptions from more common causes is important in this endeavour, even though the treatments of severe burns may be along similar lines. Thermal injury from a pyroclastic surge depends on the relative contribution of the

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the staff of the Dr Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, for their professional assistance, as well as the villagers and survivors of the 2010 eruption for their kind and willing co-operation. Professor Dougal Drysdale provided invaluable advice on the generation of fires. Special thanks to Adrien Picquout for his indefatigable support of our field work. Teguh Hari Prasyeto was our Javanese interpreter. J-C K was funded through the CASAVA (ANR contract ANR-09-RISK-002), MIA-VITA (

References (49)

  • A.V. Kulyapin et al.

    Bashkiria train-gas pipeline disaster: a history of the joint USSR/USA collaboration

    Burns

    (1990)
  • P.F. Parshley et al.

    Pyroclastic flow injury. Mount St. Helens, May 18, 1980

    Am J Surg

    (1982)
  • E.K. Abdurachman et al.

    Nuées ardentes of 22 November 1994 at Merapi volcano, Java, Indonesia

    J Volcanol Geotherm Res

    (2000)
  • B. Voight et al.

    Deformation and seismic precursors to dome-collapse and fountain-collapse nuees ardentes at Merapi Volcano, Java, Indonesia, 1994–1998

    J Volcanol Geotherm Res

    (2000)
  • K. Kelfoun et al.

    A statistical study of trees damaged by the 22 November 1994 eruption at Merapi Volcano (Java, Indonesia): relationships between ash-cloud surges and block-and-ash flows

    J Volcanol Geotherm Res

    (2000)
  • Surono et al.

    The 2010 explosive eruption of Java’s Merapi volcano—a 100-year event

    J Volcanol Geotherm Res

    (2012)
  • A. Hussain et al.

    Predicting survival in thermal injury: a systematic review of methodology of composite prediction models

    Burns

    (2013)
  • S.C. Loughlin et al.

    Global volcanic hazards and risk

    (2015)
  • C. Oppenheimer et al.

    Volcanoes

    (2004)
  • G. Heiken

    Dangerous neighbors: volcanoes and cities

    (2013)
  • M. Auker et al.

    A statistical analysis of the global historical volcanic fatalities record

    J Appl Volcanol

    (2013)
  • R. Cioni et al.

    Temperatures of the A.D. 79 pyroclastic density current deposits (Vesuvius, Italy)

    J Geophys Res

    (2004)
  • P.J. Baxter

    Medical effects of volcanoes. 1. Main causes of death and injury

    Bull Volcanol

    (1990)
  • A. Neri et al.

    4D simulation of explosive eruption dynamics at Vesuvius

    Geophys Res Lett

    (2007)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Soft tissue-related injuries sustained following volcanic eruptions: An integrative review

      2022, Burns
      Citation Excerpt :

      PDCs are a notable hazard to life, with a 1:10 dead: injured ratio, much higher than other natural disasters [1,2,29]. This review included case series examining injuries following PDC in different geographical locations [15,16,18], with thermal injuries to the skin and respiratory tract reported. Thermal inhalation can lead to acute airway and lung edema, one of the earliest causes of mortality [16].

    • The hazards of unconfined pyroclastic density currents: A new synthesis and classification according to their deposits, dynamics, and thermal and impact characteristics

      2022, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, flow overspill typically causes impact through a combination of dynamic pressure, burial under metres of deposit, and/or thermal impact from temperatures that can reach over 800 °C (Cole et al., 2015), with near binary loss of life or infrastructure. By contrast, surge detachment can cause little physical damage because of low dynamic pressures and very thin (centimetres) remaining deposits, but their thermal impact can still cause casualties and indirect damage through fire (e.g., Baxter et al., 2005; Jenkins et al., 2013; Baxter et al., 2017). The dynamic characteristics of unconfined PDCs, and therefore the type and severity of impacts sustained, vary greatly depending on the generation mechanism and travel path of the PDC, as well as the mechanism through which overspill or detachment occurs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text